Introduction
Metallic superlattices and multilayers have been studied for more than 60 years
[1]. However, until recently those investigations have had little impact on
magnetism research. The breakthrough occurred during the early 1970’s, when the
considerable advances in vacuum technologies resulted in major progress being
made in modern deposition methods. Using a variety of techniques, it has become
possible to manipulate atomic planes, lines of atoms and small clusters to
create new man made materials engineered on an atomic scale.
One of these modern deposition methods is Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE).
Originally, MBE was reserved for semi-conductor production. But in the late
1980’s it was adapted to the preparation of magnetic multilayer films. It has
revitalized basic research in magnetism [2,
3]. The MBE technique can be used to
grow high purity epitaxial films. It has enabled the production of magnetic
films which are artificially structured on the nanometer scale. In particular,
it is possible to create layered systems with variable thicknesses made of
single crystals or polycrystalline ferromagnetic, anti ferromagnetic or
paramagnetic materials. For example, multilayer films can be fabricated so that
their properties are dominated by the interfaces contribution and structurally
adjusted to meet desired characteristics [4]. The MBE synthesized structures
display many novel properties compared to bulk materials. Since the physical
dimensions of the layers are comparable to certain characteristic length scales,
such as the electron wavelength or the length of exchange interaction, it is
possible to engineer devices with specific properties [5]. Moreover, much of
modern condensed matter materials physics, basic and applied, is now based on
the development of artificial materials in unusual configurations. Two important
technological interests are the miniaturization of magnetic read heads and new
methods for increasing magnetic storage density. In addition, the excellent
crystallographic structures and well defined dimensions imply that it is
feasible to build theoretical models whose predictions can be compared to the
experimental data with good accuracy.
Another important application is that of increasing the energy product (BH) of
permanent magnet systems. Maximizing this parameter requires identifying
materials with a high saturation magnetization Msat and a high coercivity BC in
excess of BC>p Msat [6]. Moreover, the desirable qualities of a permanent
magnet material are a high remanence Mrem, and nearly linear 2nd quadrant B(H)
characteristics. Fig. 1.1 reviews the development of permanent magnets with
increasing (BH)max over the last century.
Alnico materials, developed in the 1930’s were the first modern permanent
compounds offering considerable magnetic hardness over the magnetic steels
previously available. The manufacturing process consists in precipitating
elongated Fe-Co ferromagnetic particles throughout the matrix of Al-Ni. Their
properties rely on the shape anisotropy associated with the particles. They are characterized by a (BH)max of 1.5-7.5 MGOe, and display excellent corrosion
resistance. Due to their high Curie temperature (~850°C), they are still used
for certain applications nowadays. Nevertheless, they possess a low coercive
force, meaning that they can be easily demagnetized, and must therefore be
handled properly. In the mid 1950’s, ferrites or ceramic magnets became
commercially available. They are fine particle magnets produced by powder
metallurgical methods. They exhibit high coercivities, nearly linear
demagnetization curves, and a maximum energy product (BH)max of 1-3.5 MGOe. The
magnetism of ferrites is founded in the high magneto crystalline shape
anisotropy of the particles. They constitute the most commercially important
permanent magnets because of their low cost, and also because they are
particularly well suited for many applications, including electric motors and
capacitors [7].

Figure 1.1 Progress in permanent magnets, with large maximum energy product (BH)max,
as a function of year.
However, it became apparent in the 1960’s that attempts to further enhance or
improve the magnetic properties of ferrites and alnico magnets were exhausted.
The search then began for other materials, with high uniaxial
magneto-crystalline anisotropy, high coercivity, and high saturation
magnetization.
Rare-Earth / Transition-Metal (RE-TM) intermetallic compound magnets represented
the most promising candidates, and advances in the development of these magnetic
materials over the last 40 years have had a profound and far-reaching impact on
magnetic devices. Because RE metals have a low Curie temperature TC (generally
below ambient temperature), they are combined with elements that exhibit both
good magnetic properties and high TC (greater than 500-600 K), such as the
transition elements of iron, cobalt or nickel. The RE-TM alloy magnets that have
received the most attention include alloys of SmCo5 and Sm2Co17. They exhibit a
maximum energy product of 20 MGOe and 30 MGOe respectively. However, the cost
and availability of the principle constituents in SmCo based materials limit
their commercial success. So in the 1980’s a considerable effort was expended to
replace scarce Co with abundant Fe in combination with RE metals. This,
ultimately, leads to the development of NdFeB based magnets, with (BH)max~40 MGOe. The Nd2Fe14B compound delivers the highest performance ever achieved
industrially to date, i.e. a maximum energy product of 45 MGOe.
More recently, the properties of layered magnets, at the nano-atomic level, have
attracted much attention [6,
8-14]. The underlying reason for this interest
stems from the work of Coey and Skomski [9] who have argued, on theoretical
grounds, that nano-structured magnets with a giant energy product of 120 MGOe
might be feasible, if the exchange spring mechanism in those materials could be
suppressed. Exchange springs magnets are based on the interfacial coupling of
soft and hard ferromagnetic nano-composites. The hard phase, usually a binary or
ternary RE–TM intermetallic compound, provides high magnetic anisotropy and
coercive fields. The magnetically soft phase (a TM), is pinned by the hard phase
through the strong exchange coupling. The FM coupling between hard/soft phase
leads to an enhancement of the magnetization, with the added benefit of reducing
the overall RE content. To induce strong exchange coupling, the soft phase must
have a high Curie temperature (TC(Fe) ~ 1000 K). One of the technological
advantages of exchange spring magnets is that they contain less RE content than
single component hard RE-TM intermetallics, which lowers the cost of materials
while improving corrosion resistance.
Commercial interests entail that the research into exchange springs magnets is
mainly directed towards nano-dispersed hard and soft magnetic phase structures
such as SmCo TM (TM = Co, Fe) [10,
15-19]. The magnets are fabricated by rapid
quenching and subsequent annealing or mechanical alloying to form a
nano-composite with randomly oriented hard grains [11,
12].
As mentioned earlier, magnetic exchange springs have been mainly investigated in
ferromagnetically coupled structures, and studies of anti ferromagnetically
coupled multilayer films are rarer. In this thesis, the magnetic properties of
epitaxial Laves phase multilayer films DyFe2 YFe2 have been investigated. This
essentially 2-D system is ideal for the investigation of the physics of magnetic
exchange springs in an anti ferromagnetically coupled layered system. In
particular, it avoids the structural complexities of the random two phase 3-D
system discussed by Coey [6,
9].
The aim of this work is to propose a solid experimental and theoretical
framework for the understanding of how to use the characteristics of the single
Laves phase materials in order to synthesize RE-Fe2-based nano-composite
structures with novel magnetic properties.
The magnetization reversal mechanism of the DyFe2 – YFe2 multilayer films and
the epitaxially strained Tb(1-x)DyxFe2, is studied. Interest of the Laves phase
RE-Fe2-type material arises from the strong exchange of the transition metal and
the large magnetostriction of the RE.
To elucidate the magnetic properties of the epitaxial Laves phase multilayer and
alloy films, it is important to understand first the basic of magnetism in RE
Laves phase. The origin of their magnetic properties is reviewed in chapter 2.
The growth of the epitaxial single phase RE-Fe2 films is described in chapter 3.
In particular, a brief review of the MBE method is given, together with why well
ordered single crystal RE-Fe2 films can be stabilized on sapphire substrate.
In chapter 4, the epitaxial RE-Fe2 Laves phase (RE = Dy, Y, Tb) are magnetically
characterised. The effect of the strain induced by the substrate on the magnetic
properties of the Laves phase films is also reported, since this has an
important effect on the magnetic properties of the film [20]. Finally, the
crystallographic characteristics of the bulk RE-Fe2 material are compared to
those of the epitaxially grown films.
In chapter 5, the experimental methods used to characterize the magnetic films
are detailed. The design and the principle of the Vibrating Sample Magnetometer,
the main investigatory technique used in this work for the magnetic
measurements, are explained. Also, the preparation of the samples for the
measurements is described.
In chapter 6, the magnetic measurements of exchange coupled DyFe2-YFe2
multilayer films with thin YFe2 layer, and of epitaxially strained Tb(1-x)DyxFe2
alloy films are presented and discussed. The magnetic switching behavior in
both the systems is investigated, and it is shown how to engineer their
coercivity. In addition, the simplest model of nucleation mechanism in single
phase materials by Stoner and Wohlfarth [21] is reviewed, and it is generalized
to hetero-phase structures. Theoretical predictions are then compared to the
experimental data.
The formation of magnetic exchange springs in the anti-ferromagnetically coupled
DyFe2-YFe2 multilayer films is detailed in chapter 7. It is shown that the
bending field, the onset of the magnetic exchange spring, can be engineered by
varying the thickness of the layers. A one-dimensional model is used to describe
the magnetic spin configuration in the multilayer films. Finally, it is proved
that the magnetic properties of a variety of exchange springs can be expressed
in a universal form.
Given that the relative thickness of the magnetically hard and soft layers is
readily controlled by the growth process, the impact of micro-structural changes
upon the magnetic profile of the exchange springs DyFe2-YFe2 films can be
investigated. In chapter 8, the effects of the magnetic exchange springs on the
irreversible switching field of the superlattices are presented and discussed.
It is shown that it is possible to engineer multilayer films which possess
negative coercivities. In addition, it is also possible to grow films that are
magnetically compensated. Practical applications for such magnetic systems are
proposed.
Finally, the findings of this work are summarized.
References
[1] J. W. H. duMond and J. P. Youtz, Phys. Rev. 48: 127 (1935)
[2] M. N. Baibich, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61: 2472-2475 (1998)
[3] J. Nogues and I. K. Schuller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 192 (2): 203-232 (1999)
A. E. Berkowitz and K. Takano, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200: 552-570 (1999)
[4] B. Dieny et al., Phys. Rev. B 43 (1): 1297-1300 (1991)
[5] M. Hehn, Science 272: 1782 (1996)
T. Aign, Phys. Rev. 81: 5656 (1998)
W. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 54: 4075 (1996)
[6] J. M. D. Coey, Solid State Commun. 102 (2-3): 101-105 (1997)
[7] ASM Handbook, vol. 2, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and
Special Purpose Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990, pp.
788-792
[8] E. F. Kneller and R. Hawig, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27: 3588-3600 (1991)
[9] R. Skomski and J. M. D. Coey, Phys. Rev. B 48 (21): 15812-15816 (1993)
R. Skomski, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (10): 7059-7064 (1994)
J. M. D. Coey and R. Skomski, Phys. Script. T49A: 315-321 (1993)
[10] T. Schrefl et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 127 (3): L273-L277 (1993)
[11] L. Withanawasam et al., J. Appl. Phys. 75 (10): 6646-6648 (1994)
[12] J. Ding et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 124 (L1) (1993)
[13] I. A. Al Omari and D. J. Sellmyer, Phys. Rev. B 52 (5): 3441-3447, 1995
[14] M. Shindo et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 161 (L1) 1996
[15] R. Coehoorn et al., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 80 (1): 101-104 (1989)
[16] K. O’Donnell et al., J. Appl. Phys. 76 (10): 7068-7070 (1994)
[17] J. M. Yao et al., J. Appl. Phys. 76: 7071-7073 (1994)
[18] K. Ounadjela and G. Suran, J. Appl. Phys. 63 (8): 3244-3246 (1988)
[19] S. Hirosawa et al., J. Appl. Phys. 73 (10): 6488-6490 (1993)
[20] M. Mougin et al., Phys. Rev. B 62: 9517-9531 (2000)
[21] E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 240: 599-642 (1948)